November 10th 2008 8:10 PM

DESPITE WINNING VOTE FOR SECOND TIME, COLEMAN RECOUNT COUNSEL EXPRESSES SERIOUS CONCERN REGARDING BALLOT SECURITY

Senator Coleman has been declared the winner for the second time- the first time after the ballots were counted on Election night, the second time after completion of the unofficial canvass results of counties counting the ballots a second time.  Senator Coleman remains the winner in this election despite unexplained discrepancies in reporting and statistically imponderable results from various precincts in the state that have virtually all benefitted the Franken campaign.

Coleman for Senate lead recount counsel Fritz Knaak stated: “As pleased as we are with the confirmation of Senator Coleman’s victory now that the ballots have been counted a second time, we still have serious concerns that should remain enormously troubling to every Minnesotan who expects and demands one-hundred percent accountability and transparency in our electoral process. Mysterious and unexplained reporting discrepancies, as well as statistically imponderable results from various precincts in the state, underscore the need for a greater emphasis on security of the ballots -- and equally important, the overall integrity of the recount process itself.”

Knaak pointed to specific incidents that “remain mysterious and murky” in terms of the facts, and what precisely happened:

• At 8:00pm on Friday, November 7th, the Coleman for Senate recount officials learned that the Director of Elections for the City of Minneapolis had in her possession 32 ballots- and provided no credible explanation of why they had not been put into the final count of the precincts to which they belonged and raising concerns again about after hours finding of votes.

• In Mountain Iron, Minnesota, 100 votes were added for Al Franken with the explanation that someone either “misspoke” or “misheard” the original numbers when they were called in. The same individual “misspoke” and “misheard” numbers for Barack Obama which equaled the exact same 100 votes.

• The date listed on the vote tapes was November 2nd, not November 4th, the date of the election.

 “These two enormously troubling incidents raise a legitimate cloud of doubt over the process, and exemplify why we remain concerned,” Knaak continued. “The Secretary of State’s website, containing ‘official’ ballot numbers, has changed repeatedly after business hours in the dark of night – changes which negatively impacted Senator Coleman in a disproportionate manner. To date we have been denied access to the new data necessary to determine why those changes were made -- and we still do not know who was responsible for making those changes.  We look forward to reviewing the ballots themselves during the recount process to determine the root cause of these revised vote totals.”

Continued the Coleman for Senate lead counsel, “Minnesota law requires a recount, we respect that process, and we will continue to insist that every law is followed, every legal ballot counted, and that this process remain open, accountable and transparent to the people of Minnesota.”

Knaak once again called upon Al Franken and his campaign – as well the Minnesota Secretary of State’s Office – to join with the Coleman recount team in publicly insisting on the highest degree of ballot security during this recount process. “Most important, this recount process remains just that – a recount,” Knaak concluded.  “This is not a ‘do-over,’ this is not ‘extra innings’ of a political campaign.  It is an important process that will confirm that Senator Coleman won re-election to the U.S. Senate on November 4th.” 
 

Back To The Coleman Blog

Name:
Email:
Title:
Comments:

Typical Liberals

Whenever they can't win the election outright. they start "Finding" ballots. Of course, they are always in their favor

1) 2004 Washington's Governor's Race

2) 2000 Presidential Election (We got lucky on that one)

By: Joseph Mouser

Typical GOP

I do have to say a win is a win, but as for now let the recount happen and don't declare a win till it actually is official. and to Joseph Mouser, Chill!!!!! That's a pretty childish statement you made. Grow Up

By: Brandon
Perhaps in your world only the votes for you should be counted. In this nation, we believe in EVERY voter having their vote counted before declaring a victor. If you win FAIRLY, without demonstrating your current attitude toward the recount, most in the state might be happy to back you. But it seems even some of your supporters are growing tired of your devisivness.

By: mark
The attitude displayed by Norm Coleman "Franken should call this off- that's what I would do" I don't want to see this turn into a mess with lawyers- except my lawyers" is sickening.

I gave money to this campaign. you have lost my future vote.

By: jack

The cooperative solution

As a Barkley supporter and Minnesotan interested in trust for our democratic system, I think the $90,000 invested in a hand-recount is great for the purpose of testing the accuracy of our voting and counting process. It does sound like there could easily be a few thousand votes that could be counted through human eyes that didn't register, and I imagine on a 0.01% margin, it could lean either way.

However I imagine a recount might still not bring us the "facts" we desire, with "disputed ballots" perhaps on both sides, which should be included, AS WELL as the natural FEARS that some sort of corruption has or will occur in the process with such a small margin.

Given these risks, and the desire for "healing" that Senator Coleman expressed in his suggestion that Franken withdrawal to prevent a messy recount, I consider a second solution.

Noting that NEITHER major candidate gained over 42% of the vote suggests to me that voters are equally disappointed in both candidates, and a "majority opinion" is unavailable from the recount process, I'd suggest Both major candidates ought to consider it an "honest statistical tie" and treat it as such.

So it seems to me the "most healing" decision here is to "flip a coin" and the loser can withdraw and the state-level recount can be avoided. That solution satisfies everyone who can step back from "power at all costs" which is what brought us to this cliff.

I hold a deep appreciation for facts, and counting seems so simple, but elections like this show it is not so simple.

I'm SURE the 15.3% of Barkley voters will THROW our support behind whomever wins the coin-toss, and then we'll have 57% at least who are happy, and perhaps the last 42% will let go as well.

So that's my thoughts, a week before our probably ugly recount.


By: Tom